Contact a Lawyer
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    « Stewart Trial Features Powerhouse Lawyers | Main | New Life for Legislation to Limit Class-Action Lawsuits »
    Thursday
    Jan082004

    "More Bad Judges"

    Jack Newfield of The Nation has a piece about the Bush administration's latest crop of federal judicial nominees. Needless to say, he does not approve, concluding:

    Bush is trying to transform America through lifetime judicial appointments for this biased batch and their clones. The bottom line is that the reckless Bushies are willing to violate computer privacy and vandalize the Bill of Rights to expedite this transformation. George W. Bush was appointed President by the Supreme Court after losing the popular vote by more than 500,000. Now he is trying to use the courts to legislate a mandate the voters never gave him by abusing the power of appointment and ignoring the Constitution's "advise and consent" clause.

    You can read the whole thing here. (via How Appealing)

    References (3)

    References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
    • Response
      Response: look at this site
      "More Bad Judges" - Old Legal Reader - Product Liability Lawyer Blog
    • Response
      Response: browse around here
      "More Bad Judges" - Old Legal Reader - Product Liability Lawyer Blog
    • Response
      "More Bad Judges" - Old Legal Reader - Product Liability Lawyer Blog

    Reader Comments (796)

    All I can say is that yes, the 10K was steep, but man, if you love your kids DO WHAT IS RIGHT. Maybe it wasn't what he wanted, but it was what was ordered. He could have gone in and out of court fighting for justice and putting his kids in the middle, OR, since they were sooo important (important enough to lose control, kill their mother, almost kill another man, and now wind up in prison or on death row - uh huh) perhaps he should have given up the fight and dealt with the repercussions of his choices.

    Accepting life's knocks and rising above them is what mature, rational adults do - whether they like it or not. Those who don't rise above, forever remain victims, allowing others to control them.

    Those who REACT are those who blame others.

    Those who PROACT are those who take personal accountability.

    Darren Mack had CHOICES. He reacted. He made his choices. I doubt he thinks it was worth it.
    June 27, 2006 | Unregistered Commenteranonymous
    anonymous-

    Yes, you are right. That IS what RATIONAL ADULTS DO.

    But, GideonsTrumpet is pointing out is that Mack was no longer rational because of the many injustices imposed upon him by Family Court for more than a year. That even starting the divorce process as a mature, rational adult, enduring unfair decisions month after month will wear down even the strongest among us.

    C'mon people said earlier in this blog...

    "Think about your own income. Add $25,000 to it. Imagine you have to pay that to someone you perceive as being unworthy or just someone who will not let you get out of it. Then realize there is a court order that says you have to pay that money; if you don't, you are headed to jail. Up to this point, you have done nothing criminally wrong, yet you are being treated like a criminal and worse yet the only person who can change it for you is not listening. Then come to the realization that everything you have and have worked for everyday of your life is slowly being taken away from you. Each day you work hard, but somehow each day you have less. Eventually, you will have nothing. Worse still, less than nothing. Soon you will owe more than you had to start with. You won't live enough lifetimes to get out from under it..."

    Real or perceived that was likely Mack's train of thought long before June 12. Left feeling like he had nothing left only reinforces his feeling that there is nothing left to lose.

    While his choices were far from ideal, if we are at all empathetic, we should understand why he made those choices. This does not mean condoning the crime! Simply, understanding why the crime was committed.

    And in understanding "why," rational people can work toward changing Family Court policies so that another divorce does not play out like the Mack divorce did.

    It really isn't about Darren Mack anymore. He did what he did and will be dealt with.

    The bigger problem/question still remains: WHY is there a need for bullet-proof glass at Family Court?

    Nothing will be right until that is addressed.
    June 28, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterDB
    Regarding Judge Weller & Darren Mack:



    I’d like to see the media and Men's Right's Activist groups put the emphasis on why a man like Mack would do what he did. Why would a successful man with no trouble with the law before do this? You know, like the way the media asks "why did Andrea Yates kill her five kids?" "Why do adult women molest minor students?" Believing that MRAs must all come out and condemn Mack, that THIS must be our primary message, is just another example of believing that all men are inherently violent and evil, and must forever defend themselves against this sterotypical condemnation. The message should be similar to:

    “Yes, Andrea Yates killed her children, and that was wrong, BUT why did she do it?”

    or:

    “Yes, when adult women molest children that is wrong, BUT why do they do it?”

    How about:

    “We all know that murder and attempted murder are wrong, BUT what are the circumstances that would cause an otherwise law abiding man, like Mack, to consider and carry out the actions that he did?”

    Men have only three options in the Criminal Family Courts of Amerika:

    1.) Accept a court order that is impossible to comply with.

    2.) Commit suicide

    3.) Go ballistic

    Allegedly Darren Mack "snapped" and chose 3.).

    The Family Courts offer men no other options, whereas women now have ownership of the family in Amerika.

    This is a society that is forever expanding more and more choices for women. And more and more rights.

    For men the opposite is true. Less and less choices. Less and less rights. But more and more responsibility.

    The Family Courts all across Amerika need to be completely overhauled. The fact that our courts have the type of security defenses we see in Iraq tells us that there is an "us" against "them" mentality by the courts. This is a sign of revolution one day in this country.



    June 28, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterDenis
    Denis-You make very valid points.Thank you.But, why the "k" in America?
    June 28, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterHmmm...
    Y'all are talking in circles. I give up. This discussion is kind of pointless.
    June 28, 2006 | Unregistered Commenteranonymous
    Anonymous, sorry to judge your circumstances. The fact is that this blog has revved up my post traumatic stress disorder. I am a much much better person than 6 yrs ago but still feel sick when I have to deal with the never ending saga in court.Regarding getting over things. Were all equipped differently to handle severe stress. I've met thousands of veterans, many that have killed dozens or hundred, one who lost his whole platoon at Tarawa in 15 minutes. Some can move on and some are fucked for life. You never know till it happens sometimes.Darren was someone whose breaking point was less than most of ours and he seemed very ill prepared for our lame judicial system. He was a weak man to not deal with his adversity better. He was very stupid not to realize that lying manipulative exes and their lawyers can wear your sanity down and he should have steeled himself for the horror.There are cold impersonal people that can handle anything(they make good lawyers) and their are sensitive loving people that make good social workers etc but get stressed easier.My point is that were all different with regards to coping and my big question to you is what what you do if a judges ruling killed your kids? I worried about this alot years ago but not now, I was never sure what I'd do but had lots of unpleasant thoughts back then. I'd like to know what a better coper than I would do?
    June 28, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterexpose
    Well put, expose.Sounds to me if you haven't been guided by your unpleasant thoughts over the years, you are coping wonderfully!

    We can only deal with things as we are individually capable.And it makes it infinitely more difficult to cope when you realize the professionals you are either paying personally or by way of taxes and have entrusted to help you handle your situation are only serving to harm you and that you have no say.It's easy to say "you should have" or "I would have," but, you are right, the truth is that no one knows what they will/will not do until the time comes to react. We can only hope we manage to keep our wits about us and react in a somewhat civilized manner.

    It's a shame that there is not a simple complaint/review process for Family Court decisions.The appeals process that exists is not geared towards Family Law. It was developed for other civil and criminal matters; it costs thousands of dollars in attorney's fees to utilize and requires months of waiting.Even if you win, you still lose, just in another way.
    June 28, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterDB
    seems very curious, Judge Weller's amazing recovery from a gunshot wound to the chest (or 5 shots, according to Nancy Grace on CNN today).He goes from critical to news conference in less than two weeks. Does this seem odd (as in soon to be t.v. movie)?
    June 28, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterOctober
    October-It was a judicial miracle!!LOLActually, ryan posted on here back on June 16, that the "gunshot to the chest" and "critical condition" were all just bogus claims for the media.It seems all Weller had was a few owies!! Nothing more than flesh wounds from shrapnel and flying bits of broken glass!But, that wouldn't make a good news story... it sounds much more fascinating when they say that the sniper got him!
    June 28, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterVery Curious Indeed...
    To: Hmmm

    Amerika as in a Soviet America. Family Courts are reminiscent of the Soviet (and even Nazi era Hitler "show trials" in WWII Germany), in that the determination of guilt for men occurs before the man even walks into the court room for the first time. The judge already has decided his position. It is the man who is screwed in Family Courts in Amerika before the court proceedings begin.

    For ALL men at the mercy of the Family Court, it is merely a "show trial", and the court surroundings and presence of the judge are there simply to provide the facade of justice being delivered.

    As this occured in the Soviet Union and in Nazi Germany it is accurate for men to consider this country to be Amerika, and not America.

    The marxist feminists have engineered this along with the chivalrous traditionalist conservative men in powerful positions in the legislature, and judiciary.

    They are destroying America before our very eyes:

    50+ % divorce rate

    8 in 10 divorces initiated by women

    9 in 10 divorce outcomes giving the woman sole custody of children

    Debtors prison by a totalitarian Family Court.

    As I said,"The Family" is fully owned by women in Amerika.
    June 28, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterDenis
    thanks DB. Very curious, the bullet wound issue is not a conspiracy. The bullet was a 223 hollowpoint that breaks apart on contact(as in when it hit the window). A fragmented bullet hit the judge. Had Darren planned this meticulously he would have chosen a different bullet. He had soldier of fortune and I'm sure they have ballistic studies etc there. This may go against premeditation if his lawyers prove he was an arms expert. If they werent fixing the glass I dont think I'd print this but I wanted to quell this conspiracy about the wound.For any potential people killers out there, dont go get better bullets...pray, take prozac, get a dog, go exercise, cry a lot, group therapy....but dont go do a Darren.
    June 28, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterexpose
    And to answer the Andrea Yates Question. She killed her kids because she is bat-ass insane. No need to think more. Remove her uterus(so she cant concieve in prison with connubial visits, lock her up for life.Was Darren insane, sure. Will he get life, probably. Most crimes of passion like this get life, sometimes paroled 25-40 yrs later. I'm thankfully not a lawyer but wouldn't mind hearing from the peanut gallery what their geuss is.
    June 28, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterexpose
    Just my .02 cents, you mean you actually get along with your stepchild just to make your spouse happy? C'Mon! I know the game here. You PRETEND you are a wonderful STEP PARENT to your step child, for the sake of IMPRESSING your new wife. Because you're newlyweds!

    When that wears off, give it time - it no doubt will - what will your attitude be then toward a child that is not yours? I've seen it time and again. how a step parent treats their step child.

    You're not fooling me, not this time.
    June 29, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterSundown
    DB, you don't KNOW me, that's all I'm gonna say.

    My opinions and viewpoints are based on experience from other people I've known.

    If you don't like, then shove it, OK?



    June 29, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterSundown
    Sundown,Are you replying to someone else's post, mistakenly addressing it to me?I haven't posted anything addressed to you in 10 days...
    June 30, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterDB
    Is Sundown the new FTJ here? Maybe she is the new WannabeLawyer? Nothing but nastiness and filth being posted by Sundown.

    Justmy.02- ignore the moronic comments. Sundown seems to think that loving someone has to do with blood... Her husband would be happy to know that. (Ooo, that may be my mistake, maybe they are blood?) That would explain the redneck attitude.

    And, What's up with "my opinions and viewpoints are based on experience from other people I've known"?

    That's pretty funny!Most people base their opinions and viewpoints on THEIR OWN experience... LOL!!

    I'd say everyone just needs to ignore that simpleton's posts. Maybe a more intelligent conversation will surface here.

    Have a nice day!!
    June 30, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterIgnore the shit-heads
    I think I'll spend a nice weekend camping with my kid's and the stepmother who raises them lovingly
    June 30, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterexpose
    Unfortunately, Darren Roy Mack is a hero to many fathers. Until there is equality in divorce court for fathers and children, the killings will continue. I don't see divorce equality as being an issue in our society so I expect to see many more killings in the future.It is the children who will suffer the most because of the inability of the adults to recognize that it is time to have equality for fathers in our society.
    July 1, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Doe
    Whatever
    July 2, 2006 | Unregistered Commenteranonymous
    "Whatever" I agree with you, I couldn't care how many women are killed. Makes no difference to me. I was just stating the obvious.
    July 2, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Doe
    Go ahead and ignore my simpleton posts, and that includes you.

    btw, Have a great 4th of July.
    July 3, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterSundown
    DB, it's obvious that you put too much thought (or spend too much time) reading my posts on this thread. Ten days you haven't posted and I finally respond? I don't know. That is an excellent question! I don't read the dates, I repond to posts.
    July 3, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterSundown
    John Doe,

    Any father who finds Darren Mack a hero deserves the same fate he gets, or better yet take them for a one way ride into the Black Rock. Killing someone over money is not anything worthy of hero worship. Destroying 2 families lives is not heroic. But scum are drawn to scum.
    July 3, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterBig_Daddy
    Mack is a typical spoiled rich kid that has had everything given to him all his life. He got mad and his feelings were hurt when a judge told him what to do and where to spend his money. Instead of using his brain, he got a gun. HOW STUPID!!If you want some one to blame, try his father and mother, because they did not instill self control or humility in their son.Three families have to suffer because of this slob.
    July 3, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterMichael W Weller
    Carla was gready, Darren was violent. They both will pay with their lives. The kids loose and so do the other family members. I see this crap all the time. It's time to change how we deal with divorce. If we don't, expect to see alot more killing. Seems there is a better way to deal with divorce.
    July 3, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Doe

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>