"More Bad Judges"

Jack Newfield of The Nation has a piece about the Bush administration's latest crop of federal judicial nominees. Needless to say, he does not approve, concluding:
Bush is trying to transform America through lifetime judicial appointments for this biased batch and their clones. The bottom line is that the reckless Bushies are willing to violate computer privacy and vandalize the Bill of Rights to expedite this transformation. George W. Bush was appointed President by the Supreme Court after losing the popular vote by more than 500,000. Now he is trying to use the courts to legislate a mandate the voters never gave him by abusing the power of appointment and ignoring the Constitution's "advise and consent" clause.
You can read the whole thing here. (via How Appealing)
Reader Comments (796)
I have been through almost two decades of thesame things you complain of, but my child is still underage and I know speaking out with details will only harm us even more.My story is so much worse that Mack could everhave endured, but I have to wait another yearbefore I can speak out, and I will, for it is right thing to do in order to help others not experience that negative unliveable experience that has marred my entrie life and defined us toway less than poverty level with legal tactics that have tried to destroy me, impovish us in order to turn my kid over to the ex. The drunkas you put it, has no idea of what his horriblejudgements caused us to suffer, without any comptempt against the ex and his lying lawyer.He could never keep anything straight, and I knewhe was under the infulence of something to be sostupid and biased.I look forward to the time that I can tell my story in the press.In my instance, the check never ever came.Try to raise a kid on $50 dollars a month.One can't even buy paper plates for that kind of judgement, let alone raise a child right.The Family Court of Washoe County is horrible.
Now HiringDivorced Mother or ExMust have one or more children.May or may not live with you.Must be creative enough to ask for more on a daily basis, which may or may not go to the children.Must be willing to accept a check for alimony for life.Must be willing to sit by the pool and live in a mansion.Must be willing to put yourself on a pedestal and ahead of all the women that do deserve child support for children they are raising.Must be creative enough to degrade and slander.Must be willing to sit in court 12 times a year.No experience necessary. Pay to commensurate with your creativity in the court system.
I'm mistaken, yea? Hmmm.. I didn't know there was a right or wrong opinion.
It's an opinion - that's all. You don't know what happens in these families - you know what media tells you and hearsay from others.
When are people going to start taking personal responsibility for THEIR choices? The only think Judge Weller did 'wrong' is become a judge. By pure chance, he was assigned this court case and you're blaming him? He didn't seek out Darren Mack to ruin his life - he did his job. Too bad if Darren didn't like it. Perhaps when he felt he was boiling over he should have visited his local doc and asked for help.
And as far as judges and lawyers being out for money - who isn't? How else does anybody survive these days. What about all the people who pay their attorneys $250? Why aren't they being judged and accused?
Try not to judge - don't blame the family - unless you've been there. Those "I nevers" always come back and bite ya in the ass, you know?
Self righteousness destroys.
Yes, I have been there. Yes, I was in the same judge's chambers and hated his decisions, but I overcame my emotional drama and made the best of a shitty situation.
And Darren Mack, just as well as you or I, could have chosen to use the system to his advantage - it would have cost him a lot less heartache and money. Darren Mack was in his courtroom for a reason - just like thousands of others. Personal accountability would have made a huge difference, IMO.
Btw, in Judge Weller's press conference he addressed the problems in family court.
Then it appears to be a "pattern." 50% of women lie to gain many advantages. Yes, 50% are abused. There has always been problems with JUST this issue. But this was one of many system cracks Darren experienced. People do not have experience with a nasty court fight. Normally. So, this can also be a mind blower with no other upsetting factors. Divorce alone is upsetting. Let's start with that.
Then, he is ordered to pay $10,000 a month. Even I said "shee-it" when I heard that. No matter what you make that amount is tuff. You must pay taxes and so on. I have seen Judges base it on the gross income. Bet your ass they would calculate it off the net income if it was the Judge getting a divorce. Second crack Darren fell through. And his lawyer DID NOT emotionally prepare him for that. Obviously. Duh. SCREW Bar complaints. They usually have a "buddy" on the board.
Either way Darren goes to jail. Failure to pay taxes, or contempt on the non-payment of support. He did care! Get it? AND she was out for every penny. It is not like she said "I will work with you--that is high." That may have helped and I have seen women agree a ruling was too hard even if they did not like their spouse. (AND heresay--she was spending money like mad.) I think he never touched her until he figured he might as well, and be truly accussed.
The next step is typically spend part of that $10,000 on a new guy--(my experience.) But back to facts, obviously he felt he lost everything. Everything. He went to the news, like they cared. That showed he was naive to the "system." He cared. He must have truly believed TOO MUCH in our justice system. That is obvious. And he believed in the news system. Jerk Judges is not "news." Another shocker.
So. yes, you must be nuts to shoot a Judge and think you can get away with it, nevermind the wife. My point is how bad do you have to hurt and see no light to try to gain control back? Although that was not a real solution. She was not helpful is all I have to say about her. If he was truly violent she would come off part of that award--she did have the option to trump the judge. If I feared my husband--I sure would!
The Judge was not really looking hard at both sides. My experience? Late for a golf game and no respect for Pawn Brokers. Either way, I hope a message was sent to really take time when making such important orders. It is important. It is a human life and we go on about abortion and so on.
So many people get screwed every day in family court and it is HARD to appeal. You have a better chance with a criminal charge by far. Another crack. Hey, Judges and lawyers make good money and immunity is another crack. The should not have absolute immunity from being sued. They would pay more attention and aim to be more fair.
So, once again, no options for Mack. And with all of the other sicko's out there, like the lady drowning her five kids--at least Mack thought he was making a point. Although warped. He felt it was his only point, and that with the feeling of complete shock and rage is why it happened. Right or wrong. At least we know WHY, which is never clear by real pyschopaths. They usually plead innocent.
And the other thing I noticed. He did not take out anyone else. I think if he did, we would write him off with the rest of the whack jobs who had "bad mothers" and there would be no blog. Hello? There are meanings here that disturb people when there are worse crimes with few blogs.
I am pretty sure others in here are lawyers if they are so against Mack, or Judges. They do not want a pattern set. Politics.
I left law because divorce is a "business" and you gotta keep that fight going to make the bucks. And Judges WERE lawyers at one time, so they all tip their hats. I think his family lawyer should go to jail. There's a twist.