Contact a Lawyer
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    « Stewart Trial Features Powerhouse Lawyers | Main | New Life for Legislation to Limit Class-Action Lawsuits »
    Thursday
    Jan082004

    "More Bad Judges"

    Jack Newfield of The Nation has a piece about the Bush administration's latest crop of federal judicial nominees. Needless to say, he does not approve, concluding:

    Bush is trying to transform America through lifetime judicial appointments for this biased batch and their clones. The bottom line is that the reckless Bushies are willing to violate computer privacy and vandalize the Bill of Rights to expedite this transformation. George W. Bush was appointed President by the Supreme Court after losing the popular vote by more than 500,000. Now he is trying to use the courts to legislate a mandate the voters never gave him by abusing the power of appointment and ignoring the Constitution's "advise and consent" clause.

    You can read the whole thing here. (via How Appealing)

    References (3)

    References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
    • Response
      Response: look at this site
      "More Bad Judges" - Old Legal Reader - Product Liability Lawyer Blog
    • Response
      Response: browse around here
      "More Bad Judges" - Old Legal Reader - Product Liability Lawyer Blog
    • Response
      "More Bad Judges" - Old Legal Reader - Product Liability Lawyer Blog

    Reader Comments (796)

    i got your back too justmy02. i hope you can take advantage of that positive drug test. no mercy allowed in your situation. i'm sure you know that being nice to an active addict just hurts you in the end and it benefits the kids zero to have a user for a parent. i said big prayers for your kids a few days ago because i know what your hell is(or at least my version of the same problem). i hope you get some permanency to your custody. ps how old are your two from the marriage to courtney love?
    June 20, 2006 | Unregistered Commenteroversight
    11 and 5. tell you what, she'll probably get by with just a scolding. she gets by with everything. if it were me, i would get nailed to the wall. so far she has had no consequenses at all for any of her conduct. oh well, i firmly believe karma is a bitch....she'll get hers.
    June 20, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterjustmy.02
    one thing i did with my two from the first marriage is to have the judge explain to the kids(then 7 and 5) that the decesion to not live with their mom was his because of her adult problem. this helped diffuse the whole "your dad is the reason were not together BS" that i'm sure your kids hear from her. this is the best thing that judge did for me. in the end he trusted her with visits three years later, time will tell if that is good for them.yes i know the addicts dont get punished(at least the female ones because men just leave and never pay support) but if you can be proactive now it will help. do whatever you can to remedy the political/mental war she rages through the kids so they know what the issue is without feeling sorry for her. yes, if you use drugs or something heavy like that youll get burned, so dont. but youll never win without having a plan to defeat her manipulations. against a sane mom you never want to say bad stuff and take the high road. against a freak its more like a war on terror and your goal is to provide a home for the kids with you at all costs. i was always too nice and it hurt the kids.my advice may seem harsh to anyone who hasn't lived through dealing with an addicted crazy manipulative ex that will try to parent still(because it makes their screw ups seem Ok somehow) but know that i speak with the voice of someone who has sacrificed a huge amount for my kids.
    June 20, 2006 | Unregistered Commenteroversight
    i heard a rumor that some rich lady helped darren mack somehow. She had some financial grudge against judge weller because her husband had Charla Mack's attorney
    June 20, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterexpose
    I hope the Cops find Darren Mack and bring him to justice.
    We all do.
    June 20, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterreno
    I hope the investigators find out all the crooked judges and throw them out on their asses!
    Hey oversight and justmy.02-

    Here's a good one: Years ago, my brother got stuck with child support for a kid born well into his marriage even when it turned out the kid was not biologically his and the mom somehow had no idea who the kid could belong to. (Uh, duh, bitch, weren't you there?) She even told the kid, 7 at the time, that the father should have known because it was the father's fault!! (Huh?!?) He found out 2 years after the divorce through a nasty answering machine message his chronically nasty ex left him one night when she was probably drunk. He had the tape, but it didn't matter; the judge refused to listen to it. He did the blood tests, found out it was true, and there wasn't crap he could do. And, still nothing changed in how the divorce/custody proceedings went for him. At one point, he had sole custody for over a year because of problems in the ex's house after she remarried that caused the kid to become depressed and suicidal. My brother was not even given the satisfaction of a support order for more than 10 months. When he got it, it was a total of $240 from an ex who was making over $40,000 herself; her husband, even more. The judge would not consider making the support order retroactive for the previous 10 months. Her financial disclosure claimed she paid all their expenses and didn't disclose her husband's income. When it was pointed out to the court, she wasn't reprimanded for the lies and never had to disclose anything more. They lived in a house that was at least $500,000. Then things changed, the mom brainwashed the kid during an unsupervised visit and the kid felt sorry for the mom. "She said she can't be a good mom without me living in her house so I want to go live with her again." Custody changed and the mom got support immediately: $519 (which was $10 over the max at the time) when he was only making about $30,000. The mom constantly interfered with visiation, but the judge would not enforce their agreement. This, on top of being denied purchasing the kid's health insurance through his employer. He had to reimburse them so the stepfather (not even the mother) could buy less coverage at a higher price. The situation went to hell from there.

    Hey, that's all fair isn't it? I'm proud of him for not pulling a Darren Mack. I don't know how he restrained himself. I was tempted to do it for him just watching it all happen!

    You guys are in good company... and far from alone.

    I hope someone turns that courthouse upside-down and finds out every little thing that has ever happened unfairly there. It's time to clean house at Family Court and throw out all the dirty judges and their vindictive rulings!
    June 20, 2006 | Unregistered Commentersimply amazing
    Looking forward to your call at 4:00PM.
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterRichard Gammick
    Shame on the purveyors of pain who derive their financial riches from the divorce industry.

    The clustering of their offices in downtown Reno creating nothing but a corridor of misery for the rest of us.

    Greedy lawyers and self-righteous therapists are not about to allow the reform of their cash cow, the Washoe County Family Court.

    Too many powerful people have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo.

    Your childrens pain is their gain.

    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered Commentercrestfallen
    DARREN MACK WAS RITE TO KILL THE BITCH I WISH HE KILLD THE JUDGE THE BITCH WERENT WORTH 10000 A MONTH SHE WERENT THAT GOOD A FUCK
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterReno Dadster
    ouch i know his chest is hurting...,but to be serious,when you order a wife or a man to pay 10,000 a month to their ex for alimony that is like rape, No one likes knowing there being screwed,bill gates is a billionair and 10.000 dollars is nothing to him,but i bet even he would not want to give a hundred dollars to some one he thinks does not deserve it.So i look at it like this.If a couple gets a divorce there is no way the lady or the man should get 10,000 a month.now the lady or man should not live like a bum,maybe 3,500 a month. i live in nyc and live off that and nyc is way more expensive than reno nevada.What is this world coming to? Basically a lady can cheat on you with your best friend dump you and then get a monthly check if she wanted to, but anyway mr.mack was financially well off,but what peaple fail to realize is that there a guys making 25,000 a year and is forced to give half of it up because the lady was no longer happy,thats bull.Us guys we need to stand up.we are forced to pay some ridiculous alimony payments most of the times. to make my point google paul mccartneys divorce and see how much he had to pay his ex becouse she no longer loves him.Mr.weller if u read this i hope your chest gets better....hehehe
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered Commentermy chest hurts
    a lady should not get a alimony check of 10,000 a month unless she has like 10 kids to take care of,if you want get paid like that go to college and be a doctor.I have to agree that is rape no matter what the situation. 5,000 the max for any case.
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterkim
    Obviously those who compare a court judgement to rape, have never had to endure, or nurse someone back from the physical and emotonal trauma of rape victims. Darren Mack was not "raped", unless it happened at one of his swinging sessions. He was unable to cope with not having things go his way, but that is not rape.
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterCarol
    id rather be raped once than go to family court 12 times in a year
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered Commenternot a brokeback
    i do believe the word "rape" more describes the psycological and emotional violation than it does the actual physical event. it is possible that Mr.Mack was "raped" by the system. i too have felt mentally and morrally "raped" by the system.(sorry for the spelling, but hey who's perfect?)
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterjustmy.02
    Main Entry: rapeFunction: transitive verbInflected Form(s): raped; rap·ingEtymology: Middle English, from Latin rapere1 a archaic : to seize and take away by force b : DESPOIL2 : to commit rape on
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterjustmy.02
    Marriage is fucking STUPID!haha the more I think about it the more these poor dudes are getting what they deserve (on some level).I agree that being ordered by a judge to pay your EX-SPOUSE (THAT YOU DIVORCED BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE EACH OTHER ANY MORE) $10,000 PER MONTH is equivalent to ass rape. I wouldn't really know since I've never been ass-raped, but I imagine it would SUCK! Just like I imagine paying your enemy $10,000 a month would SUCK! I'm not sure which would be worse. I don't care how much the dude makes. If Donald Trump divorces you, that does not entitle you to JACK SHIT as far as I'm concerned. Unless you were directly involved in making that money, you shouldn't get shit. Now if you were involved, then you would surely have shares of stock or part ownership in the company you helped build.

    Now, the reason I say these guys are getting a little of what they deserve is because they made the decision to get MARRIED. HELLO. Like I posted a few days ago (under "Darren's myspace account" I think), marriage is totally stupid...for men. I'm a man, and I see how bad you guys have it. The guys on here complaining...man I'm all on your side. I hope to God you don't get screwed over in court. If I were a woman, I would get fake tits, plastic surgery, fake tan, whatever it takes to get married to a rich guy, then I would cheat on him (with guys like me), and divorce him, claiming I was beaten, assaulted, and emotionally abused over the past 15 months (I wouldn't stay married much longer than that, just enough to make a strong case), but have grown accustomed to the lifestyle, and demand that I be given the Merceds Benz SL that he bought for me as a gift, that I get to keep the $100,000 of jewelry he's given me, that I get to keep the $1 million house, but need him to cover all the bills, and require at least $50,000 a month alimony (or more depending on how rich he is).

    Goddamn marriage in America is the stupidest thing ever for men.I'm sorry, but NO pussy is worth that much. Easpecially in Nevada!! lol Damn, you guys can go down to the legal brothels there, get all the sex you're willing to pay for with ZERO of the emotional baggage and drama, ZERO chance of the bitch stealing your money or accusing you of abuse, and you can be with a new, HOT, different girl EVERY time!Really, I recommend just dating a lot of women, but if you're not good with women, or can't get hot ones, then yeah, use the brothels, and you'll be better off than getting married.

    Marriage leads to demasculation for men. Basically they are paying for pussy too, but it's with the same old hag every time, and it costs MORE! How much would old Darren Mack have had to pay for pussy? Well, let's see, after marriage, you get sex, what once or twice a month? How many years were the married? I don't know but lets say 10. Let's round up and say they had sex 200 times while married. No, let's round up even more. Let's say 500 times, which ends up equally about once a week.Now let's just compute the alimony and costs over the next ten years. We won't even consider the payments past that, or all the tens or hundreds of thousands he spent on her during marriage.So $10,000/month for 10 years is 1 million two hundred thousand dollars! Plus she gets a million dollar house, plus all costs, which we'll say is another $1,000 a month. We won't add up the child support---that's the only thing the judge did that was close to right.So when all is said and done, over the next ten years, Darren would have paid out WELL OVER TWO MILLION DOLLARS for having sex 500 times. And that doesn't even include the appreciation the house will probably have. That may be a $2 million dollar house in 10 years.

    So $2,000,000 for 500 sex sessions equals $4000 for each time he had sex!! Dudes, do the math!! It ain't worth it. I guarantee you can find it cheaper than that, and with new different girls. He was paying that out for the same woman.

    Now people are going to argue with me, saying "well, what about 'love'?" It's all love, and you can't buy love and happiness, and children. Okay, fine, live in your little dream world believing that.But I'm here to tell you that you CAN be in love with a woman AND even have kids without EVER getting married to her, and handing over your balls and manhood. Married men have become the EMOTIONAL TAMPONS for their American wives. Welcome to the American dream boys. No wonder so many foreigners are able to come to the states and thrive...they have good women and they stay together, and both have vested interests in seeing their business work. For American-born men, most of their wives are total lazy dependants sucking the dudes dry.

    That said, the rest of you guys have been warned. Get married and be willing to face the repercussions. Or just keep her as your girlfriend, verbally commit to her, and live happily ever after, without having to shell out MILLIONS of DOLLARS when she decides she's not happy, or when you decide you are ready for a new woman.
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterwannabe lawyer
    amusing post. i think ive paid about 1000 for each experience(none of which i really remember). something you seem to be immune from(to your benefit) is the feminization of the american male. this government/media/hollywood/communist plot is irrelevent if you get a sweet devoted lady(which i have now) but you're in a world of crap if you get a bad one and then get to court. you're right that some guys are so stupid to marry someone with big issues(i got her pregnant,did THE RIGHT THING) and lost a ton of $ and sanity. i take responsibility for my stupidity and so should have darren mack. my only complaints about the courts have been regarding childhood safety, never money.by the way, there are just as many sweet women that marry horrible men and get tortured mentally and physically. many of them get royally fucked in court because the judge has to figure out if abuse allegations are true or is this another phony claim to get back at the guy(as darren mack alleged). there need to be serious penalties for false accusations so thevreal ones get dealt with. the false accusers get a slap on the wrist.
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered Commenteroversight
    Here is the real numbers as was given to me in documents by Darren himself. Don´t let the fancy BS done by the attorneys fool you in the court motions. Remember most if not all has been falsely documented. I saw the real financial and bank records myself.

    The order said¨.

    44,000 income15,000 income taxes that no-one remembered that had to be taken out. Remember income taxes?-------------29,000 left after taxes10,000 spousal support as per Weller´s order-------------19,000 left after spousal support14,000 all those items that were listed on the order by Weller but not put into dollars. Just the 2 morgages were 9,000 a month. I have seen the bank records.-------------5000 left after paying all the bills ordered to be paid by Weller.849 child support for one child1000 child support to the previous wife for another child.-------------3151 left after child support6000 in interest paymts and other expences that Weller did not address in his order but had to be paid. Can´t tell the bank Weller said I don´t have to pay.--------------2849 left after bills that must be paid that Weller did not address.15000 a month for attys fees to fund a war that he tried to settle many times rather than go BK.--------------17,849 left after attys fees. Remember Darren has yet to spend $1 on rent, food, gas, car, support one child full time that lived with him and one child that lived with him half time.6000 a month for all the above. Darren had a minus cashflow of

    $-23,849 per month

    based on Judge Weller´s order. Live with that for 2 years!! and see if you need to file BK. Get a grip people.

    So here it is in simple form. Weller a man making $44,000 a month to pay $61,849 before he got $1 to live on himself and to take care of his children when they lived with him. You make your own conclusion of fairness.

    Remember criminals like Charla´s atty Shawn Meador and bought and paid for Judges can make anything look reasonable in court docs. The real test is how does it play out when you have to write the check and balance the checkbook. Don´t be fooled by the surface level BS. I have seen the bank records.
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered Commentermark
    Oh, now I understand why he killed her and tried to take out a judge. Completely warranted.
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterOctober
    Not warranted but enough to make you go insane.
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterexpose
    October and all who can't see past the murder-

    Of course the murder is not warranted, nor in any way justified!

    mark in no way implied that...

    99%+ of us will agree with you on that.

    The point is: many of the orders that get handed down in Family Court are not warranted either. This may likely be the root of the problem in the Mack case.

    And, unless you have a printing press in your basement, given orders to pay out any amount of money that you do not have and each month WILL MAKE YOU CRAZY- and, as Reno witnessed last Monday, crazy to the point of becoming homicidal if the person making the orders is ignoring all the evidence you are presenting over and over, month after month. And going to court month after month is costing you even more of the money that you do not have in legal fees to defend yourself against the impossible orders.

    We all know the murder and attempted murder are crimes. While that is a valid point, it is only one of the issues in this situation.

    To keep another murder from taking place, the injustices taking place in Family Court need to be addressed. That is a bigger point now. No one can change the events of last Monday.

    Good people don't normally just snap for no reason. Not that Darren Mack's reasons were all that good... but what may seem weak reasons to us may have been very real reasons to him.

    Sometimes when a good person is made to feel irrelevent and like there is no other way out of a situation, they will snap and do the unthinkable, things they would normally see as being wrong.

    I know our society only wants to see criminals for the horrible monsters they are made out to be; that makes them easier to understand and cast aside. Many times they are monsters; sometimes they are not. Sometimes they are almost as much of a victim as their own victims are.

    It would do us good to stand back and realize they are someone's kid or someone's brother or sister; they may even be someone's parent. Many times someone has once loved or still does love them.

    But we don't like to; it makes us uncomfortable to see these terrible monsters as actually being human.

    We need to ask what went wrong. We need to understand the 'what went wrong' to keep it from going wrong again.

    Think about your own income. Add $25,000 to it. Imagine you have to pay that to someone you perceive as being unworthy or just someone who will not let you get out of it. Then realize there is a court order that says you have to pay that money; if you don't, you are headed to jail. Up to this point, you have done nothing criminally wrong, yet you are being treated like a criminal and worse yet the only person who can change it for you is not listening. Then come to the realization that everything you have and have worked for everyday of your life is slowly being taken away from you. Each day you work hard, but somehow each day you have less. Eventually, you will have nothing. Worse still, less than nothing. Soon you will owe more than you had to start with. You won't live enough lifetimes to get out from under it...

    That would not make you crazy?

    It would do it for me.
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterC'mon people...
    One of the best things I ever saw was a child rapist being transported/extridited through and airport terminal. The childs dad walks up and shoots the bastard dead. The dad gets off.Would our court system have punished a demon like that, no!! 10 yrs max for an incurable problem destined to destroy more lives.Not the same as with Mack but he was royally fucked by a bribed/or so they say/ judge. There needs to be appeals to a higher judge in cases where there has been a travesty of justice to avoid INSANITY BY UNJUST COURT RULING which is what I think got him thinking murder. Everyone has a breaking point, sooner or later we'll have an eminant domain killing like the Stephen King short story, is this the first divorce judge shot by a guy who felt hed lost everything? Who speaks for people ruined by the legal system. Will Mack be put into history as a pathologic murderer and no one cares why he did it or is he a tragic victim who lost all self control because he saw no other to make things just. Will anyone hold bad judges accountable for errors or outright crimes before we have another man driven to destroy lives because he felt his own wasnt worth living.
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered Commenteramen to that c'mon
    mark , pretty heavy figures. the average person might not understand how the judge could not do the math. did he believe the abuse charges? was he upset about the different financial records that darren presented? was he appalled by the swinger lifestyle? did he owe that lawyer more favors? how much did the lawyer contribute to his election? what were the judges words to darren when the monetary discrepancies were pointed out? the full story will come out. people dont feel sorry about 10K out of 44K as the media spins it but you have have made some valid points for your friend or acquaintance being despondent about the rulings if your figures are correct and you have your numbers down to the dollar. if you have any of the answers to my questions id love to know. one way or the other this guys story should be told, thanks for the details. also do you think the richard gammick posts are really from him. mr gammick is supposed to be an honorable man, lets hope this doesnt end with more violence.
    June 21, 2006 | Unregistered Commenteroversight

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
    Errors occurred while processing template[pageRendered/journalEntry.st]:
    StringTemplate Error: Can't parse chunk: {settingHomePageKBArticle}" target="_blank">Learn how.</a></li>
    <li>If you have already selected a front page, make sure it is enabled. Click on the Cubes icon (top right) and then click the "enable page" button.</li>
    </ol>
    </div>

    : expecting '"', found '<EOF>'
    StringTemplate Error: problem parsing template 'pageRendered/noDefaultModule': null
    StringTemplate Error: problem parsing template 'pageRendered/noDefaultModule': null