"More Bad Judges"

Jack Newfield of The Nation has a piece about the Bush administration's latest crop of federal judicial nominees. Needless to say, he does not approve, concluding:
Bush is trying to transform America through lifetime judicial appointments for this biased batch and their clones. The bottom line is that the reckless Bushies are willing to violate computer privacy and vandalize the Bill of Rights to expedite this transformation. George W. Bush was appointed President by the Supreme Court after losing the popular vote by more than 500,000. Now he is trying to use the courts to legislate a mandate the voters never gave him by abusing the power of appointment and ignoring the Constitution's "advise and consent" clause.
You can read the whole thing here. (via How Appealing)
Reader Comments (796)
bro you got a funny way of "agreeing" with people. I bet your agreeing techniques make you lots of friends. "Um yeah, I totally agree but you should be ashamed of offending all the precious mommies and young impressionable children reading, and act civilized." Ok dude, thanks for agreeing.
I agree with you too, when you said "a" and "him." So yeah we're in total agreeance, but I'd just try not to act like such a dork chief. But yeah, total agreeance here! lol
you're a clever one alright.
Take a little constructive criticism.Learn to make your point without being vulgar.
When yoou have a good point, don't ruin it being butt-heads!
Take a little constructive criticism.Learn to make your point without being vulgar.
When you have a good point, don't ruin it being butt-heads!
I'm trying to HELP you! Take it easy. NIMROD. That other post wasn't by ME. It was by Darren's ass-space account. He's trying to start drama. Just chill everyone!
You are so bent on being right, the only way you can justify your actions is to post messages pretending to be other people here.
You had a good point on Darren's blog-site, but were not smart enough to present it in an intelligent manner.
You have a foul mouth, and that is not an attractive quality.
I have nothing to apologize for.
Do everyone here a favor, go away.
You really should be ashamed! If you tell me your name, I will call your mom right now and tell her. I don't think she'd approve of your language.
Just go away. Troll.
Play time is over.Your mommy is calling.She's got the bar of soap waiting to punish you for all your bad words.
Please don't come back.
An insanity plea is beginning to sound like a realistic defense if he did in fact kill his wife. However, shooting Judge Weller appears to be a more deliberate planned out event. Lucky for him, if he did it, the Judge did not die. If they catch him, maybe he will see the light of day again before his life is over. Or, is it over already?
FUCK THE JUDGEDarren's myspace accountand theLOL and Give EVERYONE a break! impersonators
are the same pathetic being.
My vote is everyone just ignore the simpleton's posts.
It's actually wannabe lawyer (me) that basically hijacked FUCK THE JUDGE's account from him, and also posted as LOL, Jom Brumbaugh, Steve Q., Give EVERYONE a break! and others.Notice I only do it to the total retards that think they are somehow above everyone else.
But all those people are actually different people (I guess, unless they are all the same, and just I am different?). Oh yeah, I am posting as Darren's myspace account too, so Darren's myspace account and wannabe lawyer are both my accounts. All those other names I was mimicking for fun because they are 'tards.
Sorry for doing this again, but the thread was going along so well until s.simon posted dumbass shit. I can't let idiocy fly like that with being challenged. Then when I challenged her, doofus "give EVERYONE a break!" jumps in like he's saving the day and morally superior to everyone, then LOL jumps in. So that's why I tooled them. Losers. anyways, at this point everyone's really confused who's who, so I reccommend LOL and "Give EVERYONE a break!" change their aliases and start fresh, so I don't recognize them and reveal their buffoonery further.
If one parent is killed by the other, and decides to be a fugitive, or is caught and sent to prison, at least the child can still, if they choose, develop a relationship with the one still alive. The therapists will still get their money, however, the divorce attorneys will not. But if you believe Darren has money, then the Criminal Attorneys will definitely get their share. If he is bankrupt as he claims to be, then they lose too.
But, I do believe, having a mom of questionable character, and a dad who is bitter, is the more desirable choice. Miracles do happen, and people do change... so I am told. In the Mack case, we will never be able to know if this was possible, since Darren decided to take the path of least resistance.