Contact a Lawyer
This form does not yet contain any fields.
    « Judging By His Handwriting | Main | Spitzer Files $250M Fraud Suit Against H&R Block »
    Thursday
    Mar162006

    Raul Galaz v. Julian Jackson, Cal. Ct. Appeal, 2nd App. Dist. No. B184916 (Mar. 16, 2006)

    Plaintiff and appellant Raul Galaz, having successfully defrauded owners of a television program of a large amount of royalty payments, entered into an illegal moneylaundering contract with defendant and respondent Julian Jackson. Under their oral agreement, Galaz would give Jackson $59,000 in illicit royalty proceeds, which Jackson would place in an offshore bank account and return the funds in untraceable cash to Galaz, less a five percent commission for himself. Jackson, however, eschewed the commission and kept the cash. Galaz, aggrieved to find so little honor among thieves, sued Jackson for rescission and fraud. Following a bench trial, the court denied relief and ruled in favor of Jackson. The court refused to grant any relief under the illegal contract, and found Galaz’s unclean hands precluded the equitable remedy of rescinding the illegal contract. Alternatively, the court found that Galaz’s actions on the oral contract and for fraud were barred by the applicable two- and three-year statutes of limitation.

    In his timely appeal, Galaz contends (1) the trial court erred in refusing to rescind the illegal contract, and (2) his claims were not barred by the statutes of limitations. We disagree with the first contention and, therefore, have no reason to reach the second. As ur courts have long recognized, an illegal contract may not serve as the foundation of any action, either in law or in equity. This state’s courts are not in the business of helping criminals recover the proceeds of their fraudulent schemes.

    Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

    References (2)

    References allow you to track sources for this article, as well as articles that were written in response to this article.
    • Response
      Raul Galaz v. Julian Jackson, Cal. Ct. Appeal, 2nd App. Dist. No. B184916 (Mar. 16, 2006) - Old Legal Reader - Product Liability Lawyer Blog
    • Response
      Raul Galaz v. Julian Jackson, Cal. Ct. Appeal, 2nd App. Dist. No. B184916 (Mar. 16, 2006) - Old Legal Reader - Product Liability Lawyer Blog

    Reader Comments (1)

    Raul C. Galaz is up to his old tricks again... Once a thief... always a thief. He continues to defraud his ex-wife of moneys from her part of two companies while he squanders money all over the globe. He is a coward, a convicted felon and deserves to be behind bars once and for all. Raul Galaz is the example of stupidity, as he had it all and threw it all away for greed.

    October 8, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterMaurizio Fodera

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>