"More Bad Judges"

Jack Newfield of The Nation has a piece about the Bush administration's latest crop of federal judicial nominees. Needless to say, he does not approve, concluding:
Bush is trying to transform America through lifetime judicial appointments for this biased batch and their clones. The bottom line is that the reckless Bushies are willing to violate computer privacy and vandalize the Bill of Rights to expedite this transformation. George W. Bush was appointed President by the Supreme Court after losing the popular vote by more than 500,000. Now he is trying to use the courts to legislate a mandate the voters never gave him by abusing the power of appointment and ignoring the Constitution's "advise and consent" clause.
You can read the whole thing here. (via How Appealing)
Reader Comments (796)
The quickest way to a woman's pussy is to NOT be needy. You don't need pussy, and you sure as hell don't need hers. If she wants to put out great. If not, NEXT!
Besides, the way I see it, women get the long end of the stick (sorry for the pun) when it comes to sex. Have you ever heard a guy orgasm and YELL: OHHHHH GODDDDDD OH MY GOD OH MY OD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OH MY GOD OK STOP NO DONT GO GO GO GO GO OK PLEASE STOP NO NO DONT STOP AHHHHHHHHHHHH OH MY GOD
Have you ever responded to an orgasm like that? Me neither. Dudes' orgasms aren't nearly as pleasureable, not to mention that we can't have multiple orgasms the way women ca, unless you're into that tantric shit, which is way too much work for what its worth.
So yeah, as far as I'm concerned, I'm doing a woman a favor by having sex with her. Now who the hell would pay for that?? Hell, that's why they buy ME stuff! lol
Anyways, sex should be pleasurable for both parties. It should NEVER be used as a weapon by the woman, by withholding until a guy does something for her. That's bullshit. She'd be out on the doorstep pronto at my house, and I'd call up my secondary.
anyways, I need to get ready to go out. This has been fun tonight! Finally the forum is good!
I hope you come back to this forum. I like you. You're posts are too funny.
BTW - I'm not a dude ;o)
http://64.233.161.104/custom?q=cache:NBvtHzrxrN4J:openweb.tvnews.vanderbilt.edu/1982-12/1982-12-07-NBC-17.html+%22Alaska+Land+Leasing%22+chuck+weller&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1&ie=UTF-8
More proof that the constitution has been over ruled.
My story is so lopsided, indecent, and in favor of the father, that it will be unbelievable to hear once my child is of age and I can speak about it. That is why I am here getting ready one day in the next year to tell it. I am so glad to have found this forum.
The comments about the WCC Judges being biasedagainst the father's is not the issue, imho.There are things that happen in Reno that mustbe addressed on a national level in order to putthe reform on the go. Yes, there is a need tokeep judges safe, but along with that, the children that suffer from the lack of orderpolicing is in my opinion is more dangerous to children, than the danger that the judges havein their areas not being secure.
Let's talk about the children, not about thelack of visitation or support orders(which are the only ones that are policed throught the D.A.'s office.)
Consistency in parenting and support are thereal issues.
Also, the molestation slinging is really justa way to tag the parent who is being manipulated,if there really is/was molestation, Child protective Services and the police would be on it. Why do people let their liars (lawyers) spout out such horrible accusations without proof.Lawyers must be held accountable for theircontent in motions.
Details, details please !!